OCTOBER 2026 · NEO-MILK

A feeding outcome.
A bigger conversation.

A suggested 30-minute learning session. No presentation deck required.

Clinical review pending

The starting point.

Neo-MILK was a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial involving 1,627 very-low-birth-weight infants across 15 German neonatal units. Exclusive mother’s own milk at discharge increased by a model-estimated 11 percentage points (95% CI, 3–19), against a modeled control baseline of 43%. The bundled intervention cannot establish which component contributed to the result. Feeding improvement does not establish long-term benefit.

Read the linked evidence brief for further results, safety context, and limits. An 11-point model estimate should not be converted into an observed intervention rate.

Read the full paper (opens in a new tab) ↗

Read the NICU Hearts evidence brief →

Questions for the table.

  1. How does this population and setting compare with ours?
  2. What does cluster randomization change about our appraisal?
  3. What would make a similar approach feasible or difficult here?
  4. How would families define supportive, pressure-free care?
  5. What would we measure, including unintended burdens, before drawing conclusions from a local test?

Leave with a question.

Choose one uncertainty to investigate, a source to check, and someone to bring into the next conversation. Any proposed change to care needs your local clinical, governance, and family-partnership processes.

A LITTLE WAYFINDING
WHAT WOULD HELP TODAY?

Find something
useful for you.

Follow a question, explore the evidence, or learn with others.

Free resources. No sign-up.